Caveat on Time Differences between Manual Staining and Machine Staining
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Automated slide staining machine.
A machine is described which can perform the Gram stain. Comparison of slides stained by machine versus hand revealed no difference in reproducibility or accuracy. In addition to providing clean, dry, uniformly stained slides, the machine saves 24 sec per slide when compared with a hand staining technique.
متن کاملStaining Differences in Cell Nuclei
If the parenchymal cells of the liver of the rat, or certain other cells, are stained with a modified Mallory stain or with iron haematoxylin, the nuclei are stained in two different ways. This effect may be observed after various fixatives. Direct microscopical observation shows that when part of a nucleus is cut away by the microtome-knife, the part of it remaining in the section stains diffe...
متن کاملDetecting p53 gene mutation of breast cancer and defining differences between silver staining PCR-SSCP and immunohistochemical staining.
This study detects and defines the patterns of p53 gene mutations in breast cancers. We analyse p53 gene mutations through comparing the results of single-strand-conformation-polymorphism (SSCP) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), and we try to define the differences between the results of SSCP and IHC. Twenty-seven fresh primary breast cancer tissues and eight normal breast tissues were studied. T...
متن کاملComparison of machine and manual staining of direct smears for acid-fast bacilli by fluorescence microscopy.
Comparisons were made in Lusaka and in London between manual staining and staining in an automatic machine with auramine-phenol of direct smears of sputum and other types of specimen for acid-fast bacilli. No evidence was obtained of carry-over of acid-fast bacilli from positive to negative smears during machine staining. There was improved contrast between bacilli and the background in smears ...
متن کاملCellular contamination during automatic and manual staining of cytological smears.
Three routine cervical smears were contaminated with adenocarcinoma cells from a malignant serous effusion which was being processed simultaneously in an automatic staining machine. Further investigation showed that cells were transferred in up to 17% of cases. However, with manual staining, the figure could be as high as 30%. The possibility of misleading cellular transfer should therefore alw...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Microscopy Today
سال: 2000
ISSN: 1551-9295,2150-3583
DOI: 10.1017/s1551929500057199